Genetically modified(hereafter GM) crops are produced by DNA
manipulation of crops.GM crops such as Bt cotton,GM soyabean,GM corns are in
widespread use globally since the last decade.In India,Bt cotton was introduced
officially in 2002.India had initiated plans to introduce Bt Brinjal on a mass
scale,only to be banned(though temporarily)in 2010.Against this backdrop,it is
pertinent to make a detailed study on the pros and cons of GM crops and its
impact on achieving food security in longer run.
With the advent of genetic
engineering technology in late 20th century,the GM crops were
considered to be a revolutionary scientific achievement in attaining food
security.The scientific community stated that the GM crops would prove to be
pest-resistant and herbicide resistant.It would withstand the climate change as
they would resist drought as well as
cold climatic conditions.Moreover,the genetically engineered crops could
address the concerns of malnutrition through bio-fortification and other
methods,which was seen as a remedy to the problem of under-nutrition in
sub-Saharan African countries and other countries of the third-world.
The USA and European countries started massive field trials of
GM crops introducing genetically engineered crops of Soyabean,corn and cotton.Even
developing countries like India and China followed suit though on a limited
scale.The higher yield of crops was considered as its primary advantage which
would in turn address food security in the longer run.However,there are
conflicting reports,which cannot be overlooked.Sceptics claim that the linear
relationship between higher yield and genetic engineering is not always true as
crop yields are a function of complex factors.
The Indian experience with GM crops reveal some fascinating
facts.Undoubtedly,the production of cotton increased markedly during the last
decade with the introduction of Bt cotton.Policy makers and certain schools of
thought hurriedly claimed it as a product of genetic engineering.But the
increase in production was not uniform across the states.That said,Bt cotton
led to higher production in states like Maharastra but it produced mixed
results in certain states of South India and Central
India.Moreover,apprehensions were raised on its impact on environment security
and human health.Further,questions arose on the underlying motive of select GM seed
companies to capitalize on the market through monopolistic means.The
Intellectual Property Rights(IPR) was an added concern as the global companies
were feared to stake claim on their rights through extended patents.Its
disastrous impact on biodiversity was fuelled by the fact that GM crops would
lead to the extinction of local variety of crops in a bid to attain uniformity
in the production of genetic varieties.The genetic engineering technology might
spoil the synergy of plant molecules and secondary metabolites and therby spoil
the functionality of staple food.
Against this backdrop,the Technical Expert Committee(TEC)
recommended the Supreme Court to put a temporary moratorium on the field trials
and production of GM crops until corroborated by detailed studies.The
Parliamentary Standing committee comprising the Members of Parliament too
advised the government to halt the field trials of GM crops.The World Health
Organisation(WHO) too issue guidelines on GM crops and advised the nations to
undertake detailed study on the impact of such crops with respect to allergenicity,gene
transfer and its impact on health and environment.
While there are proven advantages of GM crops like
resistance of Bt cotton against cotton bollworm and nutritious food products
like vitamin-A rich golden rice(having
high content of beta-carotene),food security necessitates a holistic approach
towards ensuring accessibility,availability and affordability of nutritious
food.The drawbacks like high prices of GM seeds,environment pollution,affects
on human health might outweigh its potential benefits.In that case genetic
engineered products would turn out to be a bane rather than boon.
Therefore,instead of hastily exaggerating the advantages of
GM crops,the government ought to promote systematic Research and
Development(R&D) with respect to GM crops.The field trials are
necessary,but it should be done on crop-specific basis through effective
monitoring.An independent regulator on the lines of Biotechnology Regulatory
Authority is the need of the hour which can carry out independent regulation
without government interference.Merely granting approval to cultivation of GM
crops without considering its latent drawbacks would lead to miscalculated
consequences.
No comments:
Post a Comment